This morning a friend of mine tweeted an article on The 5 types of Leadership Canada Needs Right Now. (Thanks Mike!) I must admit that I usually don’t follow the National Post (Financial Post), but I might have to re-consider, especially if they include content like this. The fact that the on-line Globe wants to charge me after 10 reads a month may also influence that decision.
There is a lot of good insight in this post and it covers a lot of ground. Brett Wilson covers leadership perspectives from the way we run our business, to our personal lives, to how we look at the environment. I think this is the value of the article. It can be many things to many people. You don’t have to buy into it all, but even one or two takeaways are worth the read.
He starts out by talking about the US election and the desire for leadership (from our elected officials). He goes on to say: “… voters are an inconsistent bunch. We expect a lot of our elected officials, but we don’t always hold ourselves to the same standard.” I think this transcends to any type of leadership and any organization. Sometimes we forget our own role in a change process. He even goes on to quote Ghandi: ” it’s time for us to be the change we want to see in the world. ”
I especially like the section on Personal Leadership. This is something we are working on in our organization and something I am passionate about. I think it is foundational to any organization that is driving cultural change. In the article, Brett Wilson says personal leadership “… requires self-discipline and commitment to positive self-belief, such as: having confidence you can succeed; staying true to your ethics; remaining optimistic even when the odds aren’t great; not letting fear of failure get you down; believing the brightest days are ahead; inspiring and being inspired; believing you can keep improving (even in small ways)….”
I will leave it there and encourage you to take read – it is short and and beefy and to the point.
p.s. I always thought he was the most interesting Dragon.
Yesterday the Educause IT Issues Panel met. The group meets a few times a year and this was our yearly f2f meeting at the Annual Educause Conference. Unfortunately I couldn’t make the trip this year and had to participate on-line. That being said, the bulk of our work (facilitation) is done with back channel discussions and polls on Adobe Connect. It is a format that I think works very well. I did not feel I was hampered at all by being one of the three people at a distance.
At the moment I am the only Canadian on the panel, and that in itself is at times interesting, but mostly inconsequential. There are some differences around structure, such as public vs. private and the state/province and federal split, regulatory requirements and acronyms, but at the end of the day we all face very similar issues and approach things the same way. One of our threads this meeting, led to a point about what the European’s and Asian were doing in terms of service levels. That usually does not happen, and I hope we do this more.
As usual we had a great discussion, this time focusing on 3 ‘questions’:
- What is the single biggest IT-related issue currently facing your institution?
- What are the most Strategic Technologies for Higher Education over the next 3 years? (seeded by some definitions from the recent Gartner Symposium).
- What is the most appropriate role of the CIO in Higher Ed, for the rest of the decade and why?
We still need to flesh out the ideas in this discussion and will do that at our next meeting, so I don’t want to pre-empt that. I do however want to talk a bit about the role of the CIO and some things that came out there.
It seems that Universities are still trying to figure out how to integrate IT funding and decision making into the enterprise of the organization. Does the CIO report through the admin side and/or the academic side of the house? Is IT a cost centre or a strategic investment for the institution? Does the CIO run the enterprise IT shop or does the CIO have a visionary role for integrating all of IT into teaching, learning and research enterprise. Does the CIO do both?
There was a interesting post today in the Technology and Learning Blog at Inside Higher Ed by Joshua Kim, where there was a discussion of highlights from this years Educause Confernce. One post talked about the gap between Presidents/Provosts and the CIO on the effectiveness of IT investments. The presentation was based on the Campus Computing Project. The takeaway was that “Presidents and provosts are generally less sanguine about the effectiveness of IT investments than their IT officers.” The author goes on to say: “We should all pay attention to this discrepancy in perceptions of the efficacy of IT investments between our academic and IT leadership” and shares some thoughts on why this discrepancy exists. To me, the statement itself identifies the problem when it talks about the academic and IT Leadership not being aligned. I think this clearly shows that the CIO needs to be integrated into the academic leadership of the organization – they need to be one and the same – there – I played my cards. There are no IT investments, there are only “business” investments that use IT as an enabler, so the CIO needs to be embedded in the academic and research enterprise.
The other thing we talked about was the role of Chief Digital Officer. I am still processing this, but very interesting. If you have a Gatner subscription there is a paper by Dave Aron on Does your business need a CDO?. There is also a provocative piece on Why every budget is an IT budget, that includes a discussion of this role….. but these are for a future post(s)