|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Globalization, Urbanization,
and Ethnicity (Major public conference) With more than half the human race living in cities for the first time in history, and with the multi-ethnic and multi-cultural character of all major cities increasing rapidly, clearly thought out development of cities is one of the most crucial factors for economic growth, social cohesion and democratic governance world-wide. Yet cities are also the major focus of ethnic conflict and inter-group confrontation. How can we govern cities in ways that maintain social cohesion and draw on the assets of all cultural/ethnic groups in times of increasing diversity?
All sessions will be held in the Pinnacle room unless otherwise indicated. Thursday, December 3, 2009 7:45 - 8:30 AM Continental breakfast (Foyer) 8:30 - 9:00 am Registration opens 9:00 - 9:20 am Welcome and introductions
9:15
- 10:30 AM (1.25 hour) is Emeritus Professor of Political Science and the former Director of the Centre for Urban and Community Studies at the University of Toronto. He has a bachelor’s degree in economics and political science from the University of Toronto, and an M.A. and Ph.D in political science from the University of California at Berkeley. He has carried out research in many African cities since the 1960s – Mombasa and Nairobi in Kenya, Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, Makurdi in Nigeria, Abidjan in Cote d’Ivoire. In the early 1970s he served as chief planning officer to the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development of the Government of Tanzania. In the 1980s, he was the coordinator of a major project (supported by the IDRC) to study the crisis in urban infrastructure in Africa, and during the 1990s he coordinated (with Patricia McCarney) a world-wide network of researchers and policy makers (called the Global Urban Research Initiative, under the auspices of the Ford Foundation’s Urban Poverty Program) looking at research on urban policy questions in Asia, Africa and Latin America. He has written or edited eighteen books on urban subjects in the developing world, and over 50 refereed articles and chapters in books. Among his most recent books are (coedited with Mila Freire) The Challenge of Urban Government. Policies and Practices (World Bank: 2001), and (with Janice Stein) Networks of Knowledge: Collaborative Innovation in International Learning (University of Toronto Press: 2001). With Patricia McCarney, he has edited Governance on the Ground: Innovations and Discontinuities in Cities in the Developing World (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003); and with Dickson Eyoh he has edited Decentralization and the Politics of Urban Development in West Africa (Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars). He was one of two senior co-editors of the landmark volume, Cities Transformed: Demographic Change and Its Implications in the Developing World (Washington: National Academies Press, 2003). With a SSHRCC grant, he is currently researching urban participatory innovations in Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, Cote d’Ivoire and India. Professor Stren’s professional consultancies include the Rockefeller Foundation in the late 1960s on tourism on the Coast of Kenya, the IDRC in 1981 (establishing a research program in West Africa for the IDRC), the World Bank in 1982 (establishing a feasibility profile for an urban infrastructure program in Nigeria), and, in the 1990s and current decade, UNDP, UNCHS, IDRC, USAID, the Mellon Foundation and the World Bank. In 1996 he was team leader of an IDRC mission to South Africa to develop an urban policy document for the country. This was published in 1997 as the Urban Development Framework of the Ministry of Housing, Government of South Africa. In April, 2002 he was a keynote speaker at the UN Habitat “Urban Forum” in Nairobi, delivering a paper on “Our Newest Decentralization: Can We Sustain It?” In 2005 he was the lead consultant in a Swedish SIDA project to design and construct a world-wide network of agencies and institutes supporting improved access to land by the urban poor. In 2007-9 he worked with the World Bank Institute to design a manual on participatory urban governance for Bank task team leaders who develop new urban projects. In 2009 he worked with the World Bank to write part of the Bank’s strategy for African urban development. 10:30 - 11:00 am Coffee break (Foyer) Roundtable Many immigrants are by-passing urban cores and settling directly in suburbs. These settlement processes reflect development and growth patterns in dynamic metropolitan areas as well as shape them. New terms such as "ethnoburb" and "twenty-first century gateways" have developed to conceptualize these new spatial configurations. Though immigration is changing the spatial dimensions of city life in profound ways, we know very little about the social, political and economic implications of these "new" forms of settlement. , University of British Columbia
12:30 - 2:30 PM (2 hours)
is the Henry LaBarre Jayne Professor of Government, Professor of African and African-American Studies, and Harvard College Professor, at Harvard University. She holds lectureships in the Harvard Kennedy School and the Harvard Graduate School of Education. She studies the intersection of American politics and political philosophy, particularly racial and ethnic politics and policy, immigration, educational and social policy, and public opinion or political culture. Her most recent books are Bringing Outsiders In: Trans-Atlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation (2009,co-edited); The American Dream and the Public Schools (2003, co-authored); and Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation (1995). Current projects address the blurring of racial boundaries in the United States, the role of factual knowledge in citizens’ political views, and the relationship between immigration laws and the practices of political (non)incorporation of immigrants. Hochschild was the founding editor of Perspectives on Politics, and has been a member of the Board of Trustees of Russell Sage Foundation and the Board of Overseers of General Social Survey. Panel The process of international migration has been an important challenge of urban governance, especially in cities where it has the potential to upset the fragile balance between entrenched linguistic groups. The panel explores the question of linguistic diversity from a cross-national comparative perspective and with a particular focus on the politics and governance of immigration in linguistically bifurcated places. This panel will tackle the following questions: To what extent does the growing presence of immigrants accentuate or attenuate long entrenched linguistic conflicts? To what extent and how have local institutions as well as urban policies responded to the growing presence of immigrants? To what extent have immigrant communities been able to play an active role in city politics in linguistically divided cities? What are the challenges of immigrant incorporation (political, social and economic) in linguistically divided cities? Do best practices emerge from a comparative examination of the politics and governance of immigration in linguistically divided cities? , Institut de Sociologie, ULB,
Belgium 4:00 - 4:30 PM Coffee break (Foyer) Roundtable Integration can be measured in a number of ways, but one of the ultimate indicators is the participation of traditionally marginalized communities in politics. Involvement in the civic life of one’s community and country is a marker of substantive and symbolic inclusion that not only provides immigrants, minorities and Aboriginals with a voice in the decisions that affect them, but also lends legitimacy to public institutions. Indeed, when policy ignores the perspectives of entire segments of the population, it almost always falls short. Although many immigrants, minorities and Aboriginals are actively engaged in their communities, the political integration of others has fallen short. A better understanding of the patterns of political participation allows us not only to assess the barriers that impede civic engagement, but to target initiatives at the areas where policy and action will achieve the best results. This roundtable will include participants who have examined the inclusion of diverse communities in the political arena. It will look at electoral and non-electoral forms of representation including voting rights, running for public office and voluntarism, on the importation of political attitudes and traditions, and on the initiatives that have or could be adopted to strengthen the engagement of immigrants, minorities and Aboriginals in political life. , Dept of Political Science,
Concordia University 7:00 PM Conference Dinner
Friday, December 4, 2009 7:45 - 8:30 AM Continental breakfast (Foyer) Roundtable It was nearly three decades ago that Michael Lipsky coined the term "street-level bureaucrat," and yet it remains an important concept in debates about policy development and implementation. In his seminal work, Lipsky argued that policy is not necessarily made by high-level administrators and elected officials, but rather by ground-level staff, including police officers, municipal staff, public health nurses, and service-providers who are relatively autonomous and thus able to exercise discretion and develop solutions in the face of resource shortages, pressing needs or imprecise policy guidelines. This is particularly important in communities with diverse populations where policy directives and legislation may not have kept pace with changing demographics. Indeed, street-level bureaucrats have a close connection to the clients they serve and are thus able to address policy gaps in a way that is responsive to community needs. Street-level bureaucracy raises questions, however, about accountability, the effects (and ethics) of uneven policy implementation, and the potential for partiality and discrimination. This roundtable will bring together professionals involved in the implementation of policy at street-level to discuss the potential for productive outcomes and also the risks. Participants will share best practices, lessons learned and thoughts on the areas in which street-level bureaucracy offers benefits as well as potential harms. , Ottawa Police Service 10:00 - 10:30 AM Coffee break (Foyer) Panel This panel will explore the urban roots of conflicts in multinational and multireligious states. What political and institutional mechanisms have been set up to manage ethno-linguistic and ethno-religious conflict in cities? Can one identify factors that contribute to an accentuation or attenuation of tensions in these cities? What have been the causes of change in institutional settlements? What has been the impact of this multinational diversity on the practice of urban politics? Can urban policies and institutions contribute to country-level goals of ethnic stability? , Department of Planning, Policy,
and Design, University of California, Irvine
12:00 - 2:00 PM (2 hours)
is Professor of Political Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder and Director of the Center to Advance Social Science Research and Teaching (CARTSS), a campus-wide interdisciplinary center. Her research and teaching interests center on public policy and urban politics and policy, particularly issues of globalization and local democracy. Her publications include The Work of Cities (with Gary Gaile: Minnesota, 1998) on local economic development strategies, a co-authored book on Multiethnic Moments: The Politics of Urban Education Reform (Temple University Press, 2006) and numerous journal articles. She is Editor (with Michael Pagano) of Urban Affairs Review. Panel As countries have become increasingly diverse, questions have arisen about the effects of pluralism on “social cohesion.” Research by Robert Putnam suggests that diversity erodes trust, decreases social capital and causes a general civic malaise. Although diversity does not necessarily generate social conflict, it may impede the formation of bonds. People, in effect, “hunker down.” Meanwhile, research by Richard Florida suggests that diversity actually spurs creativity, which is good for cities and economic development. These findings are somewhat paradoxical and give rise to a range of opposing policy directions, which is evident in the social cohesion landscape. A comparative analysis suggests divergent approaches, conceptual frameworks, and indicators as well as discourse that ranges from critique to celebration. These are important from a policy perspective, where abstract concepts must be operationalized and implemented according to national, regional and local contexts. This panel will provide a comparative perspective on social cohesion, addressing the definition and conceptualization of social cohesion, the principle critiques of – and challenges to – social cohesion, and the kinds of policies that have been implemented in the name of social cohesion. Faculty of Philosophy, Laval
University Department of Political Science, University
of Toronto 3:30 - 4:00 PM Coffee break (Foyer) Roundtable Classical urban research on modernization and development has assumed that, because of their more intense encounters with (western) modernity and cosmopolitanism, the growth of cities in the Global South would dampen the allure of ethnicity as political identity. In reality, urbanization has been and remains a major incubator of new forms of ethnicity; cities are key sites in the valorization of ethnic identities and rise of ethnic consciousness and conflict. While patterns vary across countries the urbanization trend continues.
The least urbanized continent, Africa, for instance, is currently experiencing
the fastest rate of urbanization amongst world regions, with recent economic
and political turbulence across the continent lending intensity and complexity
to migration patterns. In Africa, as throughout the Global South, cities
remain the choice destination of migrants in search of more promising
opportunities, even as the prospects of realizing these opportunities
appear ever bleaker for the vast majority. , Department of Political Science,
University of Toronto
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||