Please enable javascript to view this page in its intended format.

Queen's University
 

Hellquist

Do newspapers and magazines have the right to expose protected groups to hatred or contempt in the name of religion, or on the basis of religion?

Facts:

In June 1997, the Star Phoenix printed an advertisement placed by Hugh Owens. It consisted of, and marketed the sale of bumper stickers containing, the following graphic and verbal information: four homophobic biblical passages, followed by an equal sign, followed a circle containing two stick figures holding hands who had been crossed out by a line. Three gay men, Gens Hellquist, Jason Roy and Jeff Dodds, interpreted this information to mean that Star Phoenix, Hugh Owens and the Bible endorsed the condemnation of gay men.  They filed a human rights complaint against the individual who placed the ad and the newspaper that published it.     [Hellquist v Owens (2001), 40 CHRR D/197 (Sask. Bd. Inq.)]

Questions:

  1. Is the advertisement prohibited under s. 14 (1) of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, as exposing a protected group to hatred or ridicule?
  2. Is the advertisement permitted under s. 5 of the Human Rights Code, and s. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as being an exercise of freedom of speech?

Rulings:

  1. Yes
  2. No

Reasoning:

  1. The Saskatchewan Human Rights Board of Inquiry found that the two stick figures holding hands was a neutral representation of gay men. Their enclosure within a circle crossed by a slash, the universal sign for forbidden, not allowed or not wanted, did not, in and of itself, necessarily promote a message of hatred. It was the equal sign equating the forbidden stick figures to explicitly homophobic biblical passages which exposed gay men to hatred. "When combined with the biblical quotations, the advertisement may result in a far stronger meaning. It is obvious that certain of the biblical quotations suggest more dire consequences and there can be no question that the advertisement can objectively be seen as exposing homosexuals to hatred or ridicule".
  2. Although ss. 5 and 14(2) of the Human Rights Code, and s. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms state that every person or class of persons enjoys the right to freedom of expression in various media, s 14 of the Code, which specifies the objectively heinous nature of the expression (it must expose a group to hatred, ridicule or indignity) and the specific target of its message (it must target persons or groups protected by human rights law) is a reasonable limit on this right.   As such, the Board of Inquiry finds that both Owens and Star Phoenix have discriminated against Hellquist, Dodds and Jones by exposing them to hatred, ridicule and indignity on the prohibited ground of sexual orientation. Both are therefore ordered to cease and desist placing or printing the homophobic advertisement and Owens is prohibited from selling or displaying the bumper sticker containing the discriminatory message.

Kingston, Ontario, Canada. K7L 3N6. 613.533.2000