R. Kumar Winter Term (Wed 6:30 - 9:30 p.m.)
Non-consequentialists characteristically hold, first, that there is a principled difference between intending harm and merely foreseeing its occurrence (Doctrine of Double Effect) and that it, along with the difference between doing harm allowing it to happen (Doctrine of Doing and Allowing), have an indispensable role to play in justifying why, for instance, it is sometimes morally permissible to do what results in another's death. Consequentialists have long been skeptical of this view. Recent work by Judith Thomson, Frances Kamm, and T.M. Scanlon challenges this orthodoxy from within the non-consequentialist camp. They argue that the reasons for which a person acts, or her intention in acting, has no bearing on what it is permissible to do. But they claim that rejecting DDE does not compromise anything of importance to non-consequentialists. The focus of the seminar will be on the assessment of this issue, starting with an overview of different ways of understanding DDE and DDA and the importance of these distinctions for non-consequentialist thought. We will then turn to very recent work in non-consequentialist theory examining the relationship between what a person intends and what she is morally permitted to do. Readings will include recent work by Kamm, McMahan, Quinn, Foot, Thomson and Scanlon, amongst others.
K. Gordon-Solmon Fall Term (Wed 6:30 - 9:30 p.m.)
When is it morally permissible for one human being to kill another? Many people believe that killing a
person is permissible when doing so is necessary to save one’s own life. But surely this isn’t always
the case. It would be wrong, for example, to use an innocent bystander as a human shield against
an oncoming bullet. Some philosophers also claim that it would be wrong to shoot down a human
projectile (who’s been involuntarily shot of a cannon, say), even knowing the force of the impact will
be fatal to you. In this course, we'll focus on the range of arguments that have been advanced in the
contemporary literature on the ethics of self- (and other-) defense. Readings will be by Jeff
McMahan, Mike Otsuka, Jonathan Quong, and Victor Tadros (among others).
Evaluation will be based on one seminar presentation (20%), a submitted final paper question and prospective bibliography (5%), and a final paper (75%).
A. Macleod Winter Term (Wed 8:30 - 11:30)
In addition to discussing various approaches (legal, economic, liberal, libertarian, utilitarian, “meritarian,” contractarian, egalitarian, etc.) to the articulation and defense of principles of justice, this seminar will explore both (a) the role played by considerations of justice in the justification of human rights and (b) the question whether there is a version of the equal opportunity ideal that can accommodate the defensible elements in otherwise rival accounts of justice.
Discussion will be based on handouts and on selections from books and articles. Members of the seminar will be urged to submit brief comment sheets on the weekly topics and readings. While the final grade will be assigned principally on the basis of a term paper, seminar participation and revised comment sheets may also contribute to determination of the grade.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL 410)
R. Murty Fall Term (Thurs 8:30 - 11:30)
This course presents a short introduction to the major topics under the heading of Indian philosophy. Beginning with the Vedic and Upanishadic philosophy, we discuss the philosophy of the Bhagavadgita. We compare this with the evolution of Buddhism and then discuss the traditional six systems of philosophy, namely, Nyaya, Vaisesika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa and Vedanta. This study then brings us to the modern period and we survey the essential philosophies of Vivekananda, Aurobindo, Tagore, Gandhi, Krishnamurti, and Radhakrishnan.
M. Ram Murty, Indian Philosophy, An Introduction, Broadview Press ISBN 978-1-55481-035-2
A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, edited by S. Radhakrishnan and C.A. Moore, Princeton University Press ISBN 0-691-01958-4
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL 420)
U. Schuklenk Winter Term (Tues 2:30 - 5:30)
This bioethics course has run successfully for a number of years. Our schedule in terms of class topics will be discussed and jointly decided on during our first class. It is imperative that you think carefully about the question of what bioethical issues you'd like to work on during this term. I will cover the first few weeks in terms of seminar presentations to ensure that you will have sufficient time to prepare your own presentation on the topic of your choice. Topics typically covered include global health ethics, human enhancement, international research ethics, end-of-life decisions, as well as a wide range of other issues.
There is no required textbook for this course. A reading list consisting mostly of journal articles will be distributed prior to our second class. It will be your responsibility to source those articles via the University Library. I will ensure that each required journal article will be accessible to you.
The success of this course depends on you reading the required readings prior to each class. This will be reflected in the grading scheme. It emphasizes three components: class participation, the quality and style of your presentation and your final paper.
You are strongly encouraged to contact me prior to the course to discuss possible class/essay/presentation topics. I can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org .
S. Leighton Winter Term (Tues 11:30 - 2:30)
This course will be concerned with Aristotle on the nature, place (or places), appropriateness and inappropriateness of emotion and particular emotions. While the main focus will be ethical or moral appropriateness, we will also consider emotion(s)’s suitability to rhetoric, the theatre, and so forth. Because Aristotle’s thought is so highly indebted to Plato’s, the first few weeks will look at the same matters in Plato. This proves interesting on its own, and of benefit to understanding Aristotle.
Works to be considered include Plato’s Phaedo, Republic, Ion and Philebus, as well as Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Rhetoric, Poetics and Politics.
(cross-lised with 4th year course in PHIL446)
P. Fairfield Winter Term (Tues 8:30 - 11:30)
This seminar examines Martin Heidegger's Being and Time, which we shall read in its entirety, followed by hisDiscourse on Thinking. Topics include phenomenology and hermeneutics, temporality, art, language, death, Heidegger's conception of "thinking," and the distinction between Being and beings. Assessment will be based on one essay and one seminar presentation.
(Cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL451)
M. Smith Fall Term (Mon 11:30 - 2:30)
This term, the focus of our seminar will be on the important linkages between epistemic and socio-political concerns. We will discuss social epistemology, issues concerning objectivity and value, epistemic responsibility and the epistemology of ignorance, epistemic injustice and oppression, and other aspects of knowledge and ignorance that have critical bearing on human life.
Our main text will be the exciting recent book by José Medina, The Epistemology of Resistance (Oxford U.P., 2013), in which we find a sophisticated and fruitful account of epistemic virtues and vices, privilege and oppression, and the crucial epistemic role of resistance in epistemology. The thesis is that better knowing will contribute to more just, less oppressive life.
In addition to Medina’s book, we will also read and discuss other current work in epistemology—for instance by Elizabeth Anderson and Miranda Fricker—on related themes, which will allow us to develop a well-rounded picture of how epistemology should serve toward justice.
Seminar. Students will be expected to have done the readings carefully and thoroughly in advance, and be prepared to discuss them.
TBA, but we’ll settle on some combination of comment sheets, seminar presentation, and final research paper.
(Cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL452)
H. Laycock Fall Term (Tues 2:30 - 5:30)
The idea that the structure of a sentence can reflect or illuminate the structure of reality is expressed clearly in Aristotle's Categories. The idea is carried forward in contemporary work in the philosophy of language, logic and ontology. In this course, the relationship between these fields of study is examined in relation to the influential thought of Frege, Quine, the linguist Otto Jespersen, and philosophers who have explored Jespersen's groundbreaking idea of the difference between 'the world of countables' and 'the world of uncountables'.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL 454)
J. Davies Winter Term (Thurs 11:30 - 2:30)
For feminists, commercial sex is a hot topic—contentious and divisive. In this country it is an especially timely topic. The Supreme Court repealed key sections of the Criminal Code of Canada in December 2013 and the possibility of new legislation criminalizing the purchase of sex by December 2014 looms large. Whether new laws come into effect or not, changes in the “sex industry” seem likely. Who will this hurt? Who benefits? How can we tell? The need for research and reflection is pressing.
In addition to political philosophy and policy questions, sex for pay raises meta-ethical issues and questions in epistemology and the philosophy of social science. Is sex for pay inherently or contingently exploitive, subordinating or alienating (in a Marxist or any other sense)? Can commercial sex be a site of enhanced or diminished agency? Is it necessarily immoral (as Kant thought)? What’s in a name—“prostituted person”, “hustler” or “sex worker”? What is presupposed in “human trafficking” versus “migrant labour” discourses? How is social and epistemological situatedness relevant? Who is in a position to know the answers to these questions? Is experience or political engagement necessary?
Since the course will run as a seminar, regular preparation and participation are essential. Students will be encouraged to develop philosophical skills and insights through collaborative research and solo writing projects. There will be opportunities for students to enhance their presentation skills and to practice sharing constructive criticism. The instructor will present introductory lectures to frame and contextualize readings, issues and methods. Our analyses will draw on the tools of intersectionality theory as well as feminist, critical race, disability and queer theorists, attending carefully to the political economy of commercial sex (especially under global neoliberalism). Assignments include a take-home midterm, a brief seminar presentation and final paper.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL459)
N. Salay Winter Term (Mon 2:30 - 5:30)
What is meaning? How do we communicate our meaning(s)? How are word meanings related to thoughts? These questions will guide our reading and discussion throughout the term. Part I of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations will serve as our touchstone. Where appropriate and helpful to the group, we will augment this core reading with more contemporary pieces, especially from the perspective of embodied cognitive science.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL464)
L. Maclachlan Winter Term (Mon 11:30 - 2:30)
The manifesto of phenomenal realism is: "Immediate experience and the present in which it is enjoyed is as real as it gets". This creed has been dominant throughout the history of philosophy, but today comes into conflict with an aggressive materialism that seeks to downgrade or eliminate conscious experience. The term "Phenomenal Realism" comes from David Chalmers, who is prepared to confront materialism. Phenomenal realism had a focus in the Cartesian cogito, but it was also fundamental in British Empiricism. Even Kant begins the Critique of Pure Reason with the claim that all our knowledge begins in experience. Obviously, a discussion of phenomenal realism will tackle the perennial problem of the mind and the body, but through its reference to the present, it is also directly involved in the problem of relating McTaggart's A-series and B-series within the philosophy of time. Moreover, since the theory does not claim that nothing is real except immediate experience, what is not immediately experienced must be known through representation. This introduces our third major problem: the problem of how representation is possible. How can we acquire knowledge of what lies beyond immediate experience?
Much of the hostility to phenomenal realism is due to the collapse of traditional empiricism and its more recent re-incarnation in the theory of sense-data. We shall examine Bradley's attack on empiricism and the theory of the association of ideas and shall consider the alternative account of immediate experience that Bradley provides. We shall also work through ideas in David Chalmers' recent book The Character of Consciousness. Another important source of ideas is The View from Nowhere, by Thomas Nagel. I shall also be using some material from my own book The Enigma of Perception, although this will be of limited help in our exploration of the new territory.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL 493)
Mick Smith Fall Term (Thurs 11:30 - 2:30)
This course will engage with a number of key environmental issues such as biodiversity and extinction, preservation or conservation, environmental and social justice, eco-feminism, deep ecology, bioregionalism and ecological restoration drawing on a number of philosophical traditions in ethics, hermeneutics, political philosophy, pragmatism, philosophy of science and phenomenology. The aim is to provide both an overview of the variety of topics that can be encompassed within environmental philosophy and to encourage participants to develop critical and innovative approaches to questions of direct practical import. While the focus will generally be on our ethical relations to non-human entities and our understanding and interpretation of these relations we will be particularly concerned to examine the ways in which our ethical evaluations might be informed by and inform our understandings of particular places/environments.
(cross-listed with 4th year course PHIL 497)
W. Kymlicka Fall Term (Mon 8:30 - 11:30)
This course sits at the intersection of two recent developments in political theory: the first is the demand by animal rights theorists to include animals as full members of the moral community; the second is the trend towards using "citizenship" as the central organizing concept for advancing claims of justice (reflected, for example, in the way that demands for women's rights, gay rights, disability rights, children's rights, minority rights etc have all been rearticulated as movements for new forms of citizenship). Given these two trends, it is natural to consider whether the claims of animal rights can also be articulated in terms of citizenship. In this course, we will examine to what extent citizenship theory can illuminate some of the central moral issues that arise in human-animal relations, and conversely, to what extent the case of animals can illuminate the strengths and limits of different conceptions of citizenship. In particular, the case of animals forces us to reconsider traditional assumptions about the capacities required for citizenship (eg., capacities for rational deliberation or public reason); about our conceptions of political agency, participation and representation; and about the nature of political communities (eg., the rules of membership, territorial boundaries, etc).