OPENING REMARKS BY MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS, MANGOSUTHU BUTHELEZI, AT THE DEPARTMENTAL STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP

Hazyview - Mpumalanga, 28 January 2002

Back to DOCUMENTS or HOME


Deputy Minister, the Honourable Mr C Nqakula, MC,
Director-General, Mr BL Masetlha,
Deputy Director-General, Mr I Lambinon,
Chief Directors,
Regional Directors,
Directors,
Other senior officials.

I welcome the opportunity of being here today amongst the leaders of our Department with my colleague, Deputy Minister Nqakula. We do not get many opportunities to meet with the top brass of the Department to express our appreciation for the work you do in running this Department. Any government in the world is judged by its civil service which indicates the important role you play in running the Department with the Deputy Minister and myself. The very fact that we are both here should indicate to you our high appreciation for the important contributions that you make towards the running of the Department.

It gives me great pleasure to open the second Strategic Planning Workshop for the Department of Home Affairs. It is hard for me to believe that one entire year has already gone by since we were here a year ago to draft the first Strategic Plan for our Department. We are now here to repeat this same exercise and we must ask ourselves how much it has changed since last year and what are the real purposes of this workshop. This year more time has been allocated for this workshop which will extend over seven days. If I consider that according to the Bible the world and everything in it was created in six days, I hope that the greater length of time allocated to this exercise will indeed be productive with tangible results.

Amongst what I would regard as tangible results is also the possibility of improving upon the morale and esprit de corps of our senior officials, and for this reason I am pleased to see that the tentative agenda of this workshop makes allowance for entertainment and bonding time. However, I hope none of this, or the pleasant surroundings of this lovely place, will detract from the fact that our primary if not sole reason for being here, is that of working hard after the holiday season.

I place great expectations on the success of this workshop and I feel it to be my duty to share with you my thinking on the matter. This workshop fulfils a legislative requirement set out in the Public Finance Management Act. However, I feel that we should not utilise this occasion merely to fulfil a legislative requirement and I am sure that none of you wishes to make this workshop a purely perfunctory exercise. We must seize this opportunity to transform this occasion into an engine which solves problems and maps out a clear way forward.

I have discussed the tentative agenda for this workshop with the Director-General who made certain proposals to me. I am not sure to what extent the agenda has been redrafted after the meeting which the Deputy Minister and I had with the Director-General. However, I wish to outline the priorities that I have identified for this workshop. To me, the starting point is that of performing a critical reading of the Strategic Plan that was produced last year, including my own preface to it. Last year's exercise was part of a learning curve which enables us to become familiar and appreciate the features, goals and structures of an overall strategic and planning exercise. Therefore, correctly, what was produced last year outlines the backbone of a strategic and planning exercise and unpacks every one of the relevant components. We must now decide whether this workshop will reproduce something similar to that which was produced last year and is of the same nature, or whether we are now ready for a qualitative leap into something different and better.

We must review last year's Plan to identify exactly what that Plan committed the Department to do or not to do from a very practical, tangible and concrete viewpoint. We need to identify what actions, directions and policies the Strategic Plan was calling for, and whether its Action Plan is really all that we need. This exercise will enable us to verify how much of the Plan has indeed been implemented and the extent to which the Department's performance has fallen short or behind the intended goals and objectives of the Plan. I tried to undertake this exercise myself in preparation for this meeting and struggled with the difficulty of identifying specific substance and content to the general procedural and conceptual aspects of the Strategic Plan. In the end, I focused on the Action Plan as the best indication of what the Strategic Plan is all about. In fact, on the one hand the Strategic Plan describes the factual situation of our Department, its mandates and its present structures, and on the other, it outlines general goals relating to acting better, performing better and functioning better, without actually specifying what needs to be done, where, when, how much and by whom. Therefore, it became somehow difficult for me to determine how much of the Strategic Plan has indeed been implemented in the past twelve months.

Last year's Strategic Plan is a valid document and still a relevant and pertinent document, which in itself highlights some of its shortcomings. It is possible that in reviewing last year's document, including its action Plan, none of you will feel you need to change one single iota in it. In fact, because of its general characteristics and broad-brush strokes, last year's Plan could indeed be re-adopted as this year's Plan with some minor adjustments and updates. As this could be done in a matter of a few hours, it is obvious that our being here for seven days of hard work highlights that we are committed and dedicated to a much more complex task and we have a greater goal in mind. I believe that this task must consist of moving from the generalities and abstractions of last year's Strategic Plan towards concrete substance, which spells out detailed actions, programmes and directives, which can provide the parameters to audit and evaluate performance and set in motion a process in which the Department can indeed begin moving from good to better.

In giving substance to last year's Strategic Plan, we need to cast any programme in detail which we may identify within a framework of concrete policy directives. Even in dealing with substance and concrete aspects, it is important that we consider the relationship between general aspects and specific implementing actions. For instance, in respect of the much-vaunted restructuring of our Department it is important that we begin giving details to what we are talking about, but that we do so within the parameters of three fundamental concrete policies which we are pursuing. In fact, reorganisation and restructuring must be shaped by two factors. First, the implementation of the new system of migration control envisaged in the Immigration Bill, including its envisaged regional structure, and second, the devolution of civic affairs delivery functions to municipalities. This latter parameter also influences how the HANIS project needs to be structured as a residual and overarching central government function, as well as the production and distribution of smart cards to be delivered by municipalities.

These parameters also offer a long-term perspective to the necessary restructuring and strengthening of our regional offices. We have placed significant attention on the strengthening of our head office. At this time, I think that it is essential that we realise that regional offices are, indeed, the crucial structure of our Department which need to be strengthened. We need to empower regional offices to deliver by increasing the level of functional self-sufficiency. This requires ensuring that they have both the capacity to perform the actions ascribed to them, as well as the legal power. To this end, we need to increase the level of training at regional offices and, perhaps, bring about a paradigm shift in which head office merely performs a function of support and capacity building in regional offices, rather than performing their work.

In this respect, it is also important that we re-prioritise communications between regional offices and head office, which requires not only setting in place better lines of communication but also adhering to agreed modalities and time-frames. For instance, if we look at stating concrete performance indicators and goals, we may think of setting forth deadlines to reply to each communication between a regional office and our head office. Similarly, we should have firm rules to ensure that any correspondence directed to the Department is acknowledged within a fixed deadline, and responded to within another.

As we look at this type of detail, we also need to consider a broader perspective to understand and rediscover the soul of our Department. In fact, even though the Department of Home Affairs is part of the Security Structure in that it needs to provide assistance, infrastructure and information to security and law enforcement organs of the State, the Department is not strictly speaking a security department, but rather a delivery one. We need to emphasise delivery and avoid excessive emphasis on security considerations which may impair delivery. Security related expenses must be assessed against conflicting priorities such as increasing the training and infrastructure available at our points of delivery. We do not have the money, the resources or the capacity to perform all our functions perfectly and we need to choose which to emphasise. To me, it is important that we emphasize delivery and ensure that those who require IDs, civic affairs documentation or Entry Permits to South Africa, receive them efficiently and in a reliable manner.

As we consider these matters, we need to place emphasis on implementation rather than general principles. I was somehow disappointed that when I was here with you last year, I delivered to you an address which, in many respects, remains not implemented. Many may find it useful to read that speech again as it foreshadows many of the issues which developed during the last year. Also, on that occasion, I stressed that priority consideration should be given to delivery aspects of our Department and highlighted how the Department should be transformed in order to restructure regions into its many centres of operation and delivery. I also indicated how the restructuring of our Department should be promoted and supported by an overhauling of our information technology backbone which should support both the reform of our system of migration control, the structuring of the HANIS project and the devolution of civic affairs delivery services to municipalities.

Incidentally, in this context, I want to emphasise once again that when I talk about devolution of civic affairs to municipalities, I do not mean merely enlisting the assistance of municipalities in the delivery of our services, but the fact that municipalities should issue IDs and perform civic affairs functions in their own name, but under our control, supervision and direction. I have discussed the matter with the Director-General who indicates that the present problem of enlisting the assistance of municipalities in our delivery of services is the first step of a process which will lead to the actual devolution of our delivery function in this field. As a national Minister, I am well aware that many municipalities are still not fully established. On this occasion we need to identify the preliminary parameters and general framework for such devolution so that we know whether we intend it to take place over a medium-term or long-term and the modalities through which we can bring it about, including the possibility of staggering its implementation depending on the administrative capacity available to municipalities and relevant financial resources.

Also, in respect of the restructuring of migration control, we need to begin moving into details to prepare for the implementation of the new reform. This will include drafting the new regulations which, inter alia, will need to embody any aspect of the Immigration Manual which relates to third party rights and legitimate expectations, such as all those aspects of the Manual relating to procedures to obtain permits. Obviously, this will require a complete redrafting because the Manual emanates out of a different piece of legislation and will need to be adjusted to the prescripts of the Immigration Bill which sets in place objective criteria replacing the extensive consultations we now perform with other departments with specific procedures to be followed and requirements to be set out in regulations on a general basis. Pari passu with the drafting of regulations, we will need to develop new procedures, practices and internal structures to implement the Immigration Bill and its regulations. These are massive tasks to be performed which I hope can be finalised on time so that when the Bill is finally enacted by Parliament we are ready to move to the next stage with minimum internal attrition and discomfort for our customers.

During this workshop, consideration should also be given to bringing about finality in the implementation of the HANIS project especially in respect of the production and issuance of smart cards. As you know, I have appointed an independent Commission, headed by Professor Fink Haysom, to provide us with recommendations on how this process should be better structured to avoid the possibility of suspicion of corruption and to ensure maximum efficiency, effectiveness and value for money. This has been one of several initiatives that I have taken during the past year to increase the interface between our Department and civil society. We need to increase our channels of communication with civil society and broaden our range of stakeholders so that any present and future processes of policy formulation can benefit from the inputs of a much broader range of stakeholders.

However, I believe that the most important portion of our work in this workshop should focus on performance monitoring. Last year's Strategic Plan's most valuable portion is the Action Plan which embodies the real substance of our commitments. We need to determine to what extent the service delivery indicators listed in it are real performance indicators, and to what extent we can improve upon it so that we can better assess the degree to which our strategic goals are achieved. I am sure that your work on the Action Plan of last year's Strategic Plan will be central to your deliberations. When I applied my mind to it, I felt a specific need to receive a report of how much of it has indeed been achieved within its targeted time-scale. However, I can see the difficulties in measuring performance and the achievement of its objectives in many respects. In other respects there are some actual figures, like the percentage of computerised service points, which can give us the measure of how far we have moved and how much further we need to walk.

Other co-efficients might be more difficult to assess, such as whether there has indeed been a 20% increase in service accessibility, or a 50% improvement in the turn-around times by our legal department or a 35% reduction in fraud, bribery and corruption. I am sure that our Director-General has developed strategies to monitor and assess performance under these goals, but I hope that the new Strategic Plan will be able to identify real mechanisms which will enable everybody, including me and the Deputy Minister, to know exactly how well, or how badly, we are doing. Amongst the things which we feel we need to monitor is our employee satisfaction, and the morale and esprit de corps of our staff.

Tangible goals and clear performance indicators will provide us with better tools to identify where we need to give more resources. I know that many segments of our Department are strangled by a lack of resources, including our legal services, in spite of the great efforts, dedication and commitment of its Chief Director, Advocate Rufus Malatji. It will also show where we need to allocate our scarce brain resources. For me, training is the most important aspect on which we must focus. Personally, I was humiliated when I read the Global Competitiveness Report published last week by the World Economic Forum and Harvard University which indicated that South Africa is at the bottom of a list of 75 developed and developing countries as far as the competence of its public officials is concerned. According to such independent report, our public officials are the most incompetent amongst all such countries, with the exception of Argentina, Greece, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

We can take umbrage and deep exception to this accusation, but this will not change international public perception. We need to prove them wrong through our actions, commitment and dedication. I do not doubt the dedication and commitment of most of our officials which has been proven over and over again. We must build on their dedication and commitment to transform into action efficiency and competence through training. I believe that training remains our greatest responsibility and we must build training within everything we do in the Department. We must begin producing training documents and instructions for simple and complex tasks alike and, for instance, ensure that each form we produce has training material and instruction relating to it. We must also develop a culture of training within the Department to ensure that people share knowledge and that anyone takes it upon himself or herself to train somebody else, and be trained by someone else. Train and be trained - should be a slogan which spells out the responsibility of everyone working in the entire hierarchy of our organisational diagram.

This workshop has very challenging tasks ahead of it and many demanding hours of work. I am very pleased that the Director-General informed me that the workshop would be divided into different groups so that the relevant officials can work on the specific issues which affect them. I recognise that there is need for people to come together to discuss experiences and exchange information, but we cannot forget that our Department has indeed two different line-functions in addition to general services and administration, which does not make it necessary for our civic affairs officials to concern themselves with migration problems and vice versa. Therefore, I am pleased that the breakaway format of this workshop will increase efficiency rather than enforcing its participants to work through plenary discussions which might not always be the most efficient way of going about the business. In fact, I believe that perhaps the most important goal of this workshop is that of beginning to transform our Department in a very subtle but important manner. We need to begin operating like a business and achieve the efficiency of a business. This applies to our internal regulations as well. The comparison to the running of a business was mentioned in last year's Strategy Plans and I think it is one of those factors in respect of which we need to apply our minds to see how much internal efficiency we have indeed added to our workings.

In conclusion, I am very aware of the enormity of the tasks and the importance of the challenges confronting this workshop. I would have liked to be with you for a much longer time. Unfortunately, the location of this workshop, so far away from Pretoria, makes it difficult for me to be with you as long as I wanted to. I asked the Director-General to see whether the workshop could be moved to Pretoria to enable me to attend it throughout. However, I was told that my request arrived too late and that all bookings had been made and paid for. Now that I am here and see once again the exceptional beauty of this place, I know that many of you are pleased that my request for moving the Seminar to Pretoria was so tardy that it became ineffective. I, too, would have liked to have been here with you for a week and I must say that my heart bleeds at having to leave here so early. However, because of prior commitments, I just have no other choice. For this reason, I sought to leave with you as much as I can of my thoughts and reflections by means of my opening remarks for this workshop, in the hope that what I have said might be of assistance. I look forward to receiving and reading the output of this intense week of work, and I wish all the participants fruitful deliberations as well as the maximum enjoyment for that which this wonderful place has to offer.


Back to DOCUMENTS or HOME