Academic Calendar 2022-2023

7 Academic Decisions and Appeals

Various types of academic decisions may be made by a course professor, Program Director, Associate Dean, Academic Progress Committee, Academic Integrity Panel, Academic Appeals Committee and/or the University Student Appeal Board.

The appeals process at Queen’s University is comprised of several levels of appeal by different appeal bodies. In accordance with the  Student Academic Appeals Policy, the decision system is based on the principle that academic decisions should generally be made by those who are most familiar with the context.

Students are strongly encouraged to meet with the Program Manager to discuss appeal procedures. The Program Manager can help to explain the process, ensure the student is prepared for the hearing, and act as a support. Students are also encouraged to consult the University Ombudsperson as a resource for information and advice (for more information see Office of the University Ombudsperson), as well as the Student Academic Appeals Policy.

Only students registered in the Certificate are eligible to initiate an appeal using the appeal procedure (see the Student Academic Appeals Policy). Students who have complete the Certificate are not eligible to submit an appeal of any kind twenty (20) business days after completion. Students who voluntarily withdraw are not eligible to submit an appeal of any kind twenty (20) business days after their withdrawal.

Appeals of academic decisions fall into four possible categories:

  1. Appeals of Grades
  2. Appeals to the Executive Director
  3. Appeals of Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business  
  4. Appeals of Academic Integrity Decisions

Appeals related to 200-Level Courses
Courses taken at the 200-level are subject to the policies and regulations of the student’s home faculty; appeals concerning 200-level courses, not related to progression in the Certificate, should therefore be directed to the home faculty.

Appeals related to 600-level courses
Courses taken at the 600-level are subject to the policies and regulations of the Certificate in Business; appeals concerning 600-level courses, not related to progression in the Certificate, should therefore be directed to the Executive Director of the Commerce Program. Inquiries should be directed to the Program Manager.

Appeals Related to Academic Progression
All appeals regarding academic standing and progression in the Certificate in Business, regardless of course registration, are evaluated by the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business. Inquiries regarding progression in the Certificate should be directed to the Program Manager.

For more information about 200-level and 600-level courses, see Course Registration.

Note that it is the student’s responsibility to clearly establish that grounds for an appeal exist as the basis for an appeal.  Below the various decision-making bodies and their mandates are explained.

7.1 Extenuating Circumstances and Academic Appeals

The Academic Regulations for the Certificate in Business are designed to ensure that academic standards are upheld and that all students are treated fairly and equitably. The appeal process is available to reconsider the suitability of sanctions or penalties imposed upon a student in light of information brought forward by the student concerning extenuating circumstances.

Extenuating circumstances means a personal circumstance beyond the student’s control that has a direct and substantial impact on the student’s ability to meet essential academic requirements or standards. Extenuating circumstances include, but are not limited to, a sudden or acute physical or mental illness, serious injury to self or significant others, bereavement, a traumatic event, or other serious personal/family crisis. This definition is not intended to be exhaustive, as there are a wide range of circumstances that may impact the well-being of students, including experiences of racism, exclusion, discrimination, sexual violence, and/or financial difficulties.

Please note extenuating circumstances do not include personal or family events (e.g. holidays, weddings), academic or exam stress, or transportation or technological difficulties. Running for election or serving on student government or other committees/associations are also not considered extenuating circumstances.

As outlined in 6.3 Academic Consideration for Students in Extenuating Circumstances, reasonable academic consideration will be implemented as appropriate during the course of the term. During the process of deciding academic appeals, the decision-maker will look at whether the student raised the issue of extenuating circumstances in a timely manner and whether reasonable academic consideration was made. Students should indicate in the appeal if the nature of the circumstances prevented such a request from being made. Experiencing a brief and/or mild illness for which academic consideration has been granted is not considered a basis for appeal.

Students are strongly advised to discuss their appeal with the Program Manager.

Unresolved Circumstances

Extenuating circumstances that affect a student’s ability to fulfill their academic obligations should be raised by the student through the academic consideration procedure during the term. If the student received academic consideration, the appeal should outline why the consideration was inadequate. If the circumstance is related to an accommodation through Queen’s Student Accessibility Services, the appeal should explain how the accommodation has changed, or how the existing accommodation is inadequate.

Multiple appeals citing the same extenuating circumstances will be reviewed closely. This review may include, with the permission of the student, consultation with the appropriate professionals involved to obtain more detailed information. In order for such an appeal to succeed, there should be evidence that the circumstances that affected the student's academic performance will be resolved within a reasonable timeline, or will be appropriately managed on an ongoing basis.

Official Documentation

Official documentation does not need to outline the specifics of the particular condition or matter affecting the student. The information should clearly indicate the ways in which the extenuating circumstances directly affected the student's performance, and it should verify that these effects were substantial enough to cause the academic problem. Information on the start, duration, and present state of the extenuating condition is critical to helping the committee to make an informed decision.

Further, the documentation should include a clear statement on whether the condition or circumstances have either improved or are being managed.

All official documentation for all levels of appeal may be verified.

Extenuating Circumstances as They Relate to Academic Performance

Note that the actual detailed personal circumstances are not as important as the effects of these events on a student’s academic performance. Therefore, students should make a direct connection between the extenuating circumstances as outlined in the supporting documents and the effect on their academic performance.

Students must outline the following:

  • when the particular event(s) occurred
  • how long they were affected
  • what course work was affected
  • whether a request for academic consideration was made, and
  • if academic consideration was provided, why it was not adequate.

Students should also outline what steps they took to deal with the extenuating circumstances during or after the occurrence (for example, consultation with a health-care professional or personal counsellor), or why they were unable to take such steps. When considering extenuating circumstances, it is recognized that each situation may vary in terms of impact and severity. The designated decision maker(s) will consider these factors in each case, and will use discretion and judgement in determining whether an academic appeal should be granted. When warranted by the extenuating circumstances, the decision-maker may make some allowance for the impact of those circumstances.

7.2 Integrity of the Academic Transcript

It is essential to maintain the integrity of a student’s Official Transcript at the University as an accurate and complete record of academic activities. According to Queen’s University policy, an Official Transcript is a complete record that includes the extent and quality of all Senate-approved work (academic and continuing education) attempted at the institution. 1

A student’s transcript lists the courses taken each year of their studies and any available course marks. Thus, a transcript is an official summary of a student’s academic performance. Once a student has written the final exam and/or submitted deliverables for the course within the academic term, the transcript should reflect that fact. An academic appeal that would significantly alter a student’s transcript (e.g. removing the grade recorded for a completed course) typically will not be granted.

7.3 Appeals of Grades

Students who wish to appeal a grade in a 200-level course should consult their home faculty.

Students who wish to appeal a grade in a 600-level course should follow the procedure outlined below.

Reassessment of Graded Deliverables

Informal Review
A student with questions about a grade for a deliverable (e.g. Examination, Essay, Report, Participation, Professionalism, Peer Review, Presentation, etc.) should follow the review policy (if any) outlined in the course syllabus in the applicable course; if the syllabus does not have a review policy, the student should request an informal review with the instructor before requesting a formal reassessment.

Students with questions about a final examination grade should first request an informal review of their final examination. Instructors may arrange for a supervised informal review of the final examination paper with a student who requests it, and are encouraged to do so. However, access to the final examination may not be granted to a student before the final marks are released.

Students are encouraged to contact their instructor regarding an informal review in a timely manner, as requests for a formal reassessment must be made within twenty (20) business days of release of the grade. If a grade changes as the result of an informal review by the instructor, the student has twenty (20) business days from the release of the new grade to submit an appeal for a formal reassessment.

If a student believes that an informal review may not be appropriate under particular circumstances, the student must provide a rationale as to why an informal review was not requested when submitting the appeal for formal reassessment.

Formal Reassessment
If informal access to the final examination is not granted, or the student is not satisfied with the informal review, the student may ask for the assistance of the Program Manager in order to initiate a formal reassessment through an appeal to the Associate Dean, Faculty (or delegate).

In a formal reassessment, the entire deliverable will be reassessed; a student may not request that only a portion of a deliverable be reassessed.  A reassessment may result in the grade increasing, decreasing, or remaining the same. Note that a passing grade may be reassessed as a failure. If the grade increases or decreases, the original instructor will be asked to recalculate the final course grade. Note that a passing final course grade may be recalculated as a failing final course grade.

An appeal, once begun, cannot be put on hold. If the appeal is withdrawn, the right to appeal the grade will expire once twenty (20) business days from release of the grade have passed.

Process
The student must meet with the Program Manager in order to submit an appeal for a reassessment. If a deliverable was completed as a team, each member of the team must agree in writing to submit the appeal. In the appeal request, a student must:

  • provide a written statement that clearly articulates grounds for reconsideration and identifies specifically why the mark given was not a correct assessment, for example:
    • show, in an objective answer, that a correct answer has been counted as incorrect;
    • show, in a qualitative or essay answer, that the response has been under-evaluated substantially;
  • provide relevant documentation to support the appeal (e.g. class notes, rough work, email communication, record of attendance, etc.); and
  • submit the original, unaltered graded material (if the work has been returned to the student, such as graded paper, graded PowerPoint deck, rubric, or written feedback from the instructor)2

Non-substantive statements that do not relate directly to the content of the deliverable (e.g. “I worked hard on this assignment”, or “I don’t usually get grades like this”) do not constitute acceptable grounds for a reassessment.

The Associate Dean, Faculty (or delegate) will facilitate the reassessment by appointing one or more reviewers, depending on the nature of the appeal. If there are two reviewers, one is normally the original instructor; however, if the original instructor is not available, or if the student can demonstrate bias or other conflict on the part of the original instructor, the Associate Dean, Faculty (or delegate) may appoint another reviewer with good knowledge of the course material. In such cases, the original instructor may be asked to provide any documentation relevant to the reassessment.

Each reviewer will independently assess the deliverable using the guidelines set out by the course instructor. Reviewers will be provided with the class average on the deliverable, which may be considered as part of the reassessment.

The Associate Dean, Faculty (or delegate) will arbitrate the final grade and report the grade to the Program Manager. The result of the appeal will usually be communicated to the student within forty (40) business days of receiving the request.

The result of the appeal may be further appealed by the student to the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business only on the basis of an error in process or procedure.

Late Informal Review and Formal Reassessment of Final Examination
Typically, an informal review of a final examination must take place in-person.  Therefore, it cannot take place until the student returns to in-person studies on campus.

After returning to in-person studies on campus, the student has twenty (20) business days to complete the informal review with the instructor and submit the formal reassessment.

For example:  Student receives grade for final examination that was written in the fall term, but will not be returning to on-campus studies until the following fall term (away on exchange in winter term and not on campus in the summer term).  This student has twenty (20) business days from first day of classes in the fall term to complete the informal review and submit the formal reassessment.

It is recommended that arrangements for the informal review be made with the instructor before returning to campus so that it can take place as early as possible in the term, in order to allow sufficient time for completion and submission of the formal reassessment by the deadline.

Late Appeal for Reassessment
To submit an appeal for reassessment beyond the deadline of twenty (20) business days, the student must appeal in writing to the Executive Director of the Commerce Program.  If approved to appeal late, student has twenty (20) business days after notification of approval to submit appeal for reassessment.  The policy Requests to Waive the Timeline applies in this case.

7.4 Appeals To the Executive Director  

The Executive Director of the Commerce Program makes some decisions, not related to progression, for students in the Certificate.  The student should request consideration as appropriate to the Executive Director as soon as he or she is aware of a situation requiring such consideration. 

Appeals to the Executive Director include requests:

There are four (4) levels of appeal for matters related to the above items:

  1. Executive Director
  2. Academic Progress Committee (APC-CIB) of the Certificate in Business
  3. Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) of Faculty Board
  4. University Student Appeal Board (USAB)

Timeline of Appeals to Executive Director

Any appeal of the academic matters listed above must be made by the end of the subsequent term of that in which the course being appealed was taken.

Term of Course being Appealed One-Term Appeal Deadline
Fall Term April 30
Winter Term September 15
Summer Term December 31

This timeline is in place for several reasons. First, the one-term timeline offers students time to seek academic advising, to write and submit an appeal, and to collect the supporting documents necessary to the appeal. Second, the appeal timeline is in place to ensure that decision making takes place in a timely manner, allowing students to continue in their academic programs without ongoing concern for unresolved matters. Third, the appeal timeline is in place to ensure fair decision making. The interested parties and the contexts within which the matter originated may not be available after this time period. Therefore, the inability to accurately assess the circumstances leading to the matter under appeal can compromise the decision-making process.

Students who have completed the Certificate are not eligible to submit an appeal of any kind twenty (20) business days after completing the Certificate.

Requests to Waive the Timeline

Exceptions to this regulation can only be granted in cases where extenuating circumstances render the student unable to appeal within the specified timeline. The student must be able to show that the extenuating circumstances were ongoing. The student must also be able to demonstrate that these circumstances prevented the student from acting between the time the original decision was received and the time at which the appeal was eventually initiated. Requests to waive the regulation governing the timeline for appeals must be submitted in writing. A request of this type should include a presentation of the specific reasons for the delay and must include documents that support the reasons for the delay. Students should speak to the Program Manager about making such a request.

Submitting an Appeal to the Executive Director

Appeals require evidence of extenuating circumstances beyond the student’s control, and supporting official documentation. For more information see Extenuating Circumstances and Academic Appeals and Official Documentation.

As part of the written appeal, a student should:

  • submit the appropriate appeal form to the Program Manager;
  • attach a letter outlining the reasons for the request and any other detail that may help the Executive Director (or delegate) understand the student’s case;
  • include all relevant documentation that the student believes supports the appeal (e.g. medical notes); and

Once all of the required documentation has been received, the student’s appeal will be reviewed by the Executive Director (or delegate).

After reviewing all information, the Executive Director (or delegate) shall either:

  • grant the student's appeal; or
  • reject the student’s appeal; or
  • move the decision to the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business (APC-CIB)

The Executive Director (or delegate) shall give their decision and supporting reasons in writing within a reasonable period of time as demanded by the complexity of the case.

The decision will advise the student that, if new information becomes available, an appeal may be resubmitted to the Executive Director (or delegate) for further consideration.

The decision shall also advise that the student has the right to appeal the original decision, in writing to the APC-CIB. A student who wishes to appeal an academic decision must give written notice of their intent to appeal and submit their appeal within ten (10) business days of receipt of the decision to be appealed. The decision shall also direct the student to the University Ombudsperson as a resource for information and advice.

7.5 Appeals To the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business  

There are three (3) levels of appeal for matters related to academic progression and decisions not related to academic progression that have already been assessed by the Executive Director.

  • Academic Progress Committee (APC-CIB) of the Certificate in Business
  • Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) of Faculty Board
  • University Student Appeal Board (USAB)

Terms of Reference

The Certificate in Business Academic Progress Committee is responsible for making decisions about academic progression and other academic matters relating to the Certificate in Business at the Smith School of Business.

Academic Progress Committee members are knowledgeable about the Smith School of Certificate in Business, and Queen’s University policies and procedures.

Jurisdiction

Decisions on academic matters not directly related to progression in the Certificate in Business are made by the Executive Director of the Commerce Program (hereafter called the “Executive Director”).

In accordance with the Senate Policy on Student Appeals, Rights and Discipline3, the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business (APC-CIB) is established by the Smith School of Business Faculty Board to monitor and make decisions about the academic progress of Certificate in Business students.

The APC-CIB considers the cases and special circumstances, if any, of students who appeal a decision regarding the application of the academic regulations, and appeals of other academic decisions made by the Executive Director.

Students may appeal the following matters:

  1. Application of the Certificate in Business progression regulations, including but not limited to requirements to withdraw, Academic Jeopardy, and other comparable decisions (see 5.1 Progression in the Certificate in Business);
  2. Decisions made by the Executive Director of the Commerce Program, including but not limited to requests:
    1. To drop a course after the last day of classes (see 4.4.6 Adding and Dropping Courses)
    2. For Aegrotat (AG) standing in a class (see 4.4.8 Aegrotat Standing)
    3. For Credit (CR) standing in a class (see 4.4.8 Credit Standing)
    4. For an extension of the deadline to submit incomplete work in a course that has been graded Incomplete (see 4.4.8 Incomplete)
    5. To extend term of study (see 4.3 Timeframe)
    6. To waive an appeal timeline
    7. Other comparable matters
  3. Decisions made by the Associate Dean (Faculty) regarding reassessments of grading

An appeal of 1) can only be made based on extenuating circumstances supported by official documentation. For more information see Extenuating Circumstances and Official Documentation.

An appeal of 2) can be made based on the following considerations:

  • lack of procedural fairness;
  • inappropriate consideration of extenuating circumstances;
  • academic policies and principles reflected in the School’s regulations were not upheld; or
  • the decision made was unreasonable4

An appeal of 3) can be made based on the following considerations:

  • lack of procedural fairness.

No Jurisdiction

The APC-CIB does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals of:

  • matters related to the reassessments of deliverables which are not related to process and procedure (such appeals are made to the Associate Dean, Faculty);
  • findings or sanctions related to departures from Academic Integrity (such appeals are heard by the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Panel).

Membership

APC-CIB hearings shall normally be heard by a minimum of four (4) members, all of whom are faculty.  An APC-CIB hearing may not be heard by fewer than three (3) members.  One of the faculty members shall be appointed Chair if the Chair of APC-CIB is unable to attend.

Four (4) faculty members (one of whom shall be appointed the Chair) will normally serve for a period of three (3) years, preferably with staggered terms. Faculty members are appointed by the Associate Dean (Faculty).  New members shall assume their duties on July 1 of each year.

The APC-CIB will be supported by the Program Manager of the CIB. The Program Manager will serve as an advisor to the APC-CIB, and may attend APC-CIB hearings, and will have no voting rights. 

Role of the Chair

The Chair of the APC-CIB will be a faculty member. Another member of the APC-CIB may be delegated the role of Chair if the appointed Chair is unable to participate in a particular case.

Normally, the Chair shall:

  • convene hearings;
  • preside over hearings of the APC-CIB according to the Rules of Procedure, and provide direction when a procedural issue is not addressed within the Rules of Procedure5;
  • participate in the deliberations and decision-making;
  • guide the APC-CIB in the uniform and consistent application of the regulations and relevant policies;
  • ensure hearings are conducted fairly and with due process; and
  • draft and finalize the decision of the APC-CIB consistent with the findings and reasons of the APC-CIB members.

Rules of Procedure

The following Rules of Procedure apply to the General Proceedings, Appeal Hearings (“hearings”), Decisions, Post-Hearing and Record-Keeping matters of the Academic Progress Committee of the Certificate in Business (APC-CIB).

These Rules of Procedure shall be interpreted liberally to facilitate the just, expeditious, and cost-effective determination of every proceeding on its merits.

APC-CIB Decisions will be made in accordance with relevant school regulations and policies
The APC-CIB will adhere to the Certificate in Business program Academic Regulations, as well as policies and procedures of the School and Queen’s University.

All appeals are to be heard by the APC-CIB in a private hearing
To protect the privacy and confidentiality of students, APC-CIB meetings and hearings are closed to the public.

Hearings are not normally recorded, unless a special request is made by the student in advance of the hearing. In such a case, the Chair of the APC-CIB (“Chair”) will decide whether to record the hearing. The Chair may also wish to record a hearing, and will inform the parties of the intention to do so in advance of the hearing. Any transcripts of a hearing will be provided to either party upon request, in which case a copy will also be provided to the other party. Transcripts must be treated as confidential. There will be no recording of the APC-CIB’s deliberations. Participants may take their own not/es during the hearing. All such notes are transitory6  and are not considered to be University Records.

No conflict of interest
In cases where an APC-CIB member has, or may be reasonably perceived to have, a conflict of interest with respect to a specific case, that individual may not serve at the APC-CIB hearing in connection with that case7.

APC-CIB members are to be present for the entire hearing
No member of the APC-CIB will participate in the deliberations or the final decision of the APC-CIB unless the member is present for the entire appeal hearing.

Supplementary rules of procedure
As needed, the Chair has the power to issue additional rules of procedure to govern the conduct of a hearing.

The APC-CIB has no power to compel any person to attend a hearing
The Chair may request the participation of parties and witnesses, but cannot compel participation.

Appeal Hearing

A student who wishes to appeal the application of the Certificate progression regulations or an academic decision made by the Executive Director has a right to a hearing before the APC-CIB.

The student must give written notice of their intent to appeal within five (5) business days of receipt of the decision to be appealed. The student must submit their written appeal, including any supporting documentation, within ten (10) business days of receipt of the decision to be appealed.

If a student would like to request an extension of the deadline to submit the written appeal and/or documentation, a written request must be submitted to the Program Manager (or delegate). The student must submit this request before the original deadline, along with a written rationale explaining why the extension is required and, if applicable, a description of the nature of the documentation to be submitted. The APC-CIB will evaluate the request and, if the request is approved, provide a revised deadline. The Program Manager (or delegate) will communicate the decision to the student.

Written Submissions8

As part of the written appeal, a student should:

  • submit a brief letter to address the progression or academic decision;
  • include all relevant documentation that the student believes supports the appeal (e.g. medical notes)
  • indicate whether they intend to appear before the APC-CIB;
  • indicate if they will bring a representative to the hearing and advise who that representative will be, and;
  • indicate their desired remedy for the situation.

Students are strongly encouraged to discuss their appeal with the Program Manager. The Program Manager can help ensure their written submission is complete. The Program Manager can also attend hearing as a support person or delegate.

In the case of appeals of academic decision made by the Executive Director or Associate Dean (Faculty), the Chair of the APC-CIB will share the student’s submission with the relevant decision maker, who will have five (5) business days following receipt of the student’s submission to respond with their own written submission if they wish.

The Executive Director or Associate Dean (Faculty)’s submission should include:

  • the reasons for their decision;
  • any pertinent evidence, and;
  • a list of any persons they intend to bring to the Appeal Hearing.

Pre-Hearing

The Program Manager (or delegate) will:

  • set a hearing date for the APC-CIB;
  • coordinate the collection of materials relevant to the student’s appeal including, but not limited to, the written submissions as above;
  • distribute the appeal file to the APC-CIB members and any other party to the appeal;
  • arrange for the hearing to be conducted via telephone or video conference;
  • attend the hearing when asked.

All hearings will be held via telephone or video conference. It is the expectation students who wish to attend the hearing will make themselves available within a reasonable period of time. Typically, this will be within fifteen (15) business days from the date the student is contacted by email to schedule a hearing. Students are expected to actively monitor their Queen’s email account and respond in a timely manner. Late requests to schedule a hearing because the student missed email communication from the APC-CIB or delegate(s) will not be considered.

After setting a hearing date, the Program Manager or their delegate(s) will give the student notice of the hearing. A notice of hearing will include:

  • a statement of the time, place and purpose of the hearing;
  • a statement of the structure of the meeting, including the names of all people expected to be in attendance;
  • a statement that explains a student has a right to representation and highlights the role of the Office of the University Ombudsperson; and
  • a statement that explains if the student notified does not attend the hearing, the APC-CIB may proceed in the student's absence and the student will not be entitled to any further notice in the proceeding.

There may be times when a student is uncomfortable, or unable, to communicate with the APC-CIB and/or the Program Manager due to the traumatic nature of the extenuating circumstances. In this case, students may appoint a delegate. A delegate is an individual acting on behalf of a student. A delegate may assist the student with communication with the Program Manager and the APC-CIB, the preparation and submission of documentation, and may act as a support during the hearing. Students may ask the Program Manager, a counsellor, a family member, or another appropriate person to act as their delegate. Written consent must be received from the student for the delegate to act on their behalf.

Students can also choose to be accompanied by a support person at any meeting with an academic decision-maker. A “support person” is an individual whose role is to provide emotional support and assistance. A support person can be anyone of the student’s choice so long as that person is not directly involved in the issue, for example as a witness. The support person may be an Ombuds Academic Appeal Advisor, if assigned by the University Ombudsperson to the case. A support person does not advocate on behalf of a student.

The Proceeding

  1. APC-CIB members will have access to the student's appeal file, which will contain the following materials:
    1. the original decision letter;
    2. all written response(s) by the student to the progression or academic decision;
    3. all documents provided by the student;
    4. the written response of the Executive Director if one was provided;
    5. a copy of the student's most recent transcript.
  2. The student has the right to appear at the hearing, or to opt not to appear at the hearing.
  3. A hearing may proceed and a decision made without additional input from the student in cases where the student opts not to appear at their hearing.
  4. The student has the right to representation, including an Ombuds Academic Appeal Advisor or legal counsel or other agent (all at the student’s own expense) at the appeal hearing. The student must inform the Chair of the name and role of any representatives in advance of the hearing. The APC-CIB may also invite legal counsel to a hearing, in which case the student will be informed in advance of the hearing.
  5. If the student is appealing a decision made by the Executive Director or Associate Dean (Faculty), they (or delegate) will normally attend the hearing, and make oral submissions. If a student has a legal advisor, a decision-maker or the members of a decision-making body can nevertheless question the student directly. The student’s legal advisor cannot answer questions on the student’s behalf.
  6. Members of the APC-CIB may ask questions of the Program Manager or other Commerce Program representatives for the purpose of clarification.
  7. Other witnesses may be asked to participate in the hearing as deemed necessary by the Chair. Witnesses are individuals who have first-hand knowledge of the matters at issue in the appeal hearing; the evidence of ‘character’ witnesses will not normally be received by the APC-CIB. Each party shall have an opportunity to question witnesses. The Chair can limit questioning of a witness if the Chair believes the questioning is irrelevant, abusive, or otherwise inappropriate.
  8. The Chair has the right to exclude evidence that is deemed irrelevant, repetitive, or otherwise inappropriate.
  9. If, during the course of the hearing, the Chair decides that more information is required in order to clarify a matter, the Chair may adjourn the hearing to permit the relevant parties to bring forward such information or facts or to permit the APC-CIB to obtain such information.
  10. The Chair may decide to adjourn the hearing at the request of a party if the Chair believes that a party may be unfairly prejudiced should the hearing proceed.
  11. The APC-CIB has the right, after the hearing, to seek confirmation and/or verification of any evidence, claims, or submissions made by any participants in the hearing. If versions of evidence are found to be conflicting or inaccurate, the Chair may request submissions from the Parties on this issue. Where it appears that false information was provided to the APC-CIB, the matter may be investigated under the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Policy.

The Decision

After hearing all the evidence, the APC-CIB will deliberate. The deliberations of the APC-CIB are confidential.

Following deliberations, the APC-CIB may:

  1. Dismiss the Appeal and uphold the original decision of the Executive Director or Associate Dean (Faculty). In the case that the student be required to withdraw from the Certificate, a formal letter advising the student of the requirement to withdraw will be issued; or,
  2. Allow the Appeal and grant the remedy requested by the student; or,
  3. Allow the Appeal in part and modify the original decision, and impose an appropriate sanction. This may include:
    1. Imposing specific conditions under which the student will be permitted to continue in the Certificate and/or any requirements the student must meet, including the timelines within which such conditions and/or requirements must be met;
    2. Requiring the student to:
    3. repeat a course;
    4. achieve a minimum grade(s);
    5. Placing the student on Academic Jeopardy until the student satisfies all conditions and/or requirements within the timeline(s) set by the APC-CIB.
    6. Imposing other terms and/or conditions as may be appropriate for the specific situation.

No decision-maker in the University has the power to direct that a student receive compensation for any costs or expenses incurred in the course of any University-based proceeding.

The APC-CIB Decision shall be communicated to the student within five (5) business days, or within a reasonable time as demanded by the complexity of the case, by the Program Manager or their delegate(s).

The Decision Letter will include the reasons for the Decision, will advise that the student has a right to appeal, in writing, to the Smith School of Business Academic Appeals Committee, and will advise that notice of intent to appeal must be given within five (5) business days of receipt of the APC-CIB’s decision. It will also direct the student to the University Ombudsperson as a resource for information and advice.

The Decision Letter shall be the official record of the Appeal. The Decision Letter will include the effective date of any actions to be taken by the Certificate (see 5.2 Effective Date of Sanctions). However, in accordance with the Student Academic Appeals Policy, the student normally is entitled to exhaust all levels of appeal before sanctions are applied.

APC-CIB shall address the effective date of any conditions and/or prohibitions in the Decision Letter.

Records Management

Appeal Records consist of all documents filed by the parties, the recording, if any, of the appeal hearing(s), the transcript, if any, of the recording, and the Decision Letter issued by the APC-CIB.

Responsibilities of the Chair

The APC-CIB Chair or delegate is responsible for collecting and distributing Appeal Records. The Chair (or delegate) shall handle such records in a secure manner which protects the confidentiality of the documents.

Records Responsibilities of the Chair

Once the APC-CIB renders its decision:

  • The Decision Letter is the official record of the Decision, a copy of which shall be kept by the Commerce Program Office in accordance with records retention policy.
  • Original Appeal Records are to be kept by the Commerce Program Office in accordance with records retention policy.
  • Transitory records shall be destroyed immediately following the issuance of the APC-CIB’s Decision.
  • Duplicated records shall be destroyed.

Unless compelled to do so by law, or authorized by the student in writing, Smith does not disclose the contents of student records to any party outside the University unless it constitutes public information.

7.6 Appeals of Academic Integrity Decisions

Course professors will normally investigate and make decisions regarding possible violations of academic integrity in their courses in accordance with the Smith School of Business Academic Integrity Policy.

Appeals of professors’ decisions regarding academic integrity are made to the Academic Integrity Panel. 

In cases where the Academic Integrity Panel is the initial decision maker, appeals are made to the Academic Appeals Committee.

7.7 The Academic Appeals Committee

The Smith School of Business Academic Appeals Committee (AAC) has jurisdiction over all matters related to academic appeals involving students registered in the School of Business (with the exception of the PhD and Master of Science programs). The AAC hears appeals of decisions made by Academic Progress Committee and the Academic Integrity Panel.

Please see the terms of reference for the AAC for further information.

Appeals of decisions made by the AAC are made to the University Student Appeal Board.

7.8 The University Student Appeal Board

Students wishing to appeal a decision by the Academic Appeals Committee must make their intention known to the University Student Appeal Board (USAB). All students should be familiar with their rights as established in the Student Academic Appeals Policy, including section E., System for Handling Appeals to University Student Appeal Board (USAB).

The USAB is the final internal appeal body at Queen’s University. The decision of the USAB is final, and there is no further level of appeal.